 |
3 in a row, Action, Adventure, Arcade, Board games, Brain teasers, Business simulators, Detective games, Games for kids, Games for Windows, Hidden object, Hide and seek, I-spy, Latest games, Logic games, Mac games, Match 3, Micro management, Mobile games, Mystery games, Puzzle, Seek and Find, Simulation, Strategy games, Time management |
|
Tell your friend about this game. Just type their e-mail and press Send button:
| Francisco 2012-11-24 05:27:28 |
| Jessica1. True altruism can not truly exist, silmpy because humans always put themselves first. One may argue that giving to charity is a completely selfless act, but is it really? Giving to charity would be a way to keep the guilt off people's shoulders, instead of a way of helping others. Seeing a homeless man on a street, many would pause to hand him some spare change, but that is not called being altruistic. It's called giving the man some change so I won't feel bad about it later. It can be stated that instead of giving money to those less fortunate, humans just don't want to feel guilty inside. The incentive in this particular case is a good feeling the feeling that one has done something completely selfless. Therefore, one may conclude that altruism does not exist in this world. 2. Why should it matter the motives behind the actions? What matters is not the reasoning, but rather the actions itself. So what if someone had only donated to stop the guilt in their hearts? Giving to charity for the wrong reasons is ten times better than not giving at all. A homeless man would focus more on the money received, rather than the reason why it was given in the first place. Even if true altruism cannot be found on this planet, it is hardly something to mourn over. After all, as long as society is benefiting from their actions, who could complain? |
|
|
| Francisco 2012-11-24 05:27:26 |
| Jessica1. True altruism can not truly exist, silmpy because humans always put themselves first. One may argue that giving to charity is a completely selfless act, but is it really? Giving to charity would be a way to keep the guilt off people's shoulders, instead of a way of helping others. Seeing a homeless man on a street, many would pause to hand him some spare change, but that is not called being altruistic. It's called giving the man some change so I won't feel bad about it later. It can be stated that instead of giving money to those less fortunate, humans just don't want to feel guilty inside. The incentive in this particular case is a good feeling the feeling that one has done something completely selfless. Therefore, one may conclude that altruism does not exist in this world. 2. Why should it matter the motives behind the actions? What matters is not the reasoning, but rather the actions itself. So what if someone had only donated to stop the guilt in their hearts? Giving to charity for the wrong reasons is ten times better than not giving at all. A homeless man would focus more on the money received, rather than the reason why it was given in the first place. Even if true altruism cannot be found on this planet, it is hardly something to mourn over. After all, as long as society is benefiting from their actions, who could complain? |
|
|
| Melsi 2012-11-24 19:45:43 |
| One of the things that pelope like about video games and other games is the opportunity to take on a challenge in a safe (safe enough, by the player's standards) environment. This is also, to some extent, the reason that pelope try to defeat cancer, malaria, and malnutrition: They want a challenge, and they want to FEEL like they've accomplished something. My preference would be to have pelope seek to FEEL like they've accomplished something and ACTUALLY accomplish something at the same time. Video games are kind of like the very worst non-profit organizations in that you can feel like you're accomplishing something without actually accomplishing anything. |
|
|
| Melsi 2012-11-24 19:45:45 |
| One of the things that pelope like about video games and other games is the opportunity to take on a challenge in a safe (safe enough, by the player's standards) environment. This is also, to some extent, the reason that pelope try to defeat cancer, malaria, and malnutrition: They want a challenge, and they want to FEEL like they've accomplished something. My preference would be to have pelope seek to FEEL like they've accomplished something and ACTUALLY accomplish something at the same time. Video games are kind of like the very worst non-profit organizations in that you can feel like you're accomplishing something without actually accomplishing anything. |
|
|
Disagree with the game review or have anything else to say about the game?
Feel free to post your comments below:
|
|
|
 |
Buy now
